Legal Opinion
Lee v. Fresenius Medical Care, Inc.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided November 15, 2007No. A05-1887PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDERSON, Paul H., Justice.
In August 2004, Susan Lee filed a claim in Saint Louis County Conciliation Court, alleging that her former employer, Fresen-ius Medical Care, Inc., failed to compensate her for paid time off that she had earned and was entitled to receive upon Fresenius’s termination of her employment. The conciliation court ordered Fre-senius to pay Lee for the paid time off plus fees and then granted Fresenius’s motion for appeal and removal to district court. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Fresenius. Lee then appealed to the Minnesota Court of…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Pine River State Bank v. MettilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Travertine Corp. v. Lexington-SilverwoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- Vlahos v. R&I Construction of Bloomington, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- McConkey v. Flathead Electric CooperativeMontana Supreme Court · 2005
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Caldas v. Affordable Granite & Stone, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Karen Chambers v. The Travelers CompaniesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- Jeff Knutson v. Schwan's Home Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
- Fisher v. PayFlex Systems USANebraska Supreme Court · 2013
- Reisdorf v. 13, LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2015
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.