Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Gresham v. Delaney

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 29, 1942No. 33,160PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Denied a jury trial by respondent, a justice of the peace, appellant brought mandamus to compel its allowance, asserting that all statutory precedents to a jury trial had been fulfilled. Upon the return day, the trial judge granted respondent’s motion for judgment on the pleadings, denied a similar motion of appellant, and dismissed the alternative writ. The basis was that respondent’s decision, being a judicial judgment, could not be questioned in a mandamus proceeding, but was open to attack only by appeal to the municipal court, where the alleged error could be reviewed. A motion to vacate…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Security State Bank v. BrechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  2. Brown v. Minnesota Thresher Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  3. Lockwood v. BockSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  4. State ex rel. Quale v. PenneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Shema v. Thorpe Bros.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  2. State Ex Rel. Gresham v. DelaneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  3. Winnetka Partners Ltd. Partnership v. County of HennepinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  4. Quevli v. First National Bank of WindomSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API