Legal Opinion
First National Bank of Barron v. Strimling
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 16, 1976No. 45850PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Scott, Justice.
This case resulted in an order for judgment in favor of plaintiff, First National Bank of Barron (Barron), against defendant, Bertram M. Strimling, in an action on a promissory note. Strimling counterclaimed against Barron and brought a third-party action against Franklin National Bank (Franklin) and Joseph F. Ringland, Jr., claiming certain misrepresentations and the breach of some agreements made between Strimling and Ringland. The jury returned a special verdict finding that agreements and misrepresentations had been made by Ringland but that Strimling had waived his rights…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mount Vernon Trust Co. v. BergoffNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Engstrom v. FARMERS & BANKERS LIFE INSURANCE CO.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- German-American Finance Corp. v. Merchants & Manufacturers State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- State, by Head v. Aamco Automatic TransmissionsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- Markville State Bank v. SteinbringSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Eide v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- Winnetka Partners Ltd. Partnership v. County of HennepinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- Lawler v. First National Bank of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 1978
- Brever v. State Bank of Young America (In re Kohls)District Court, D. Minnesota · 1987
- Hartford Fire Insurance v. E.A. Sween Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1996