Legal Opinion

McLane Minnesota, Inc. v. Commissioner of Revenue

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided September 17, 2009No. A08-1632PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DIETZEN, Justice.

Following an audit, the Commissioner of Revenue (Commissioner) issued an order assessing additional tobacco tax against McLane Minnesota, Inc. (McLane). McLane appealed that order and also sought a refund for the tobacco tax paid, arguing that it erroneously calculated its tax on the price that it paid its suppliers for tobacco products rather than the manufacturer’s list price. The Commissioner denied McLane’s administrative appeal and refund claim, and McLane appealed to the Minnesota Tax Court. On cross-motions for summary judgment, the tax court granted the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Exxon Corp. v. Governor of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Quill Corp. v. North Dakota Ex Rel. HeitkampSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. New Energy Co. of Indiana v. LimbachSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. County of Dakota v. CameronSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  2. Conga Corporation, d/b/a Conga Latin Bistro v. Commissioner of Revenue, Relator.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
  3. Singer v. CommissionerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  4. Marlow Timberland, LLC v. County of LakeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  5. Harbaugh v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API