Legal Opinion

Lee v. Fresenius Medical Care, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 8, 2006No. A05-1887PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PETERSON, Judge.

This appeal is from a summary judgment that appellant Susan Lee is not entitled to be paid for unused vacation time that she had earned at the time she was discharged because Lee’s employment eon-tract included a provision that an employee who is terminated for misconduct is not eligible for payment of earned but unused vacation time, and Lee was discharged for misconduct. We reverse and remand.

FACTS

Appellant Susan Lee began working at the Miller-Dwan dialysis center in Duluth in 1991 and became an employee of respondent Fresenius Medical Care, Inc. in August 2000 when…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. O'MALLEY v. Ulland Bros.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  2. Funchess v. Cecil Newman Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  3. Brown v. Tonka Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
  4. Winnetka Partners Ltd. Partnership v. County of HennepinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lee v. Fresenius Medical Care, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  2. Lee v. Fresenius Medical Care, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API