Legal Opinion

Ferguson v. Industrial Accident Commission

California Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1958No. L. A. 24914PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.

Petitioner seeks annulment of a decision and award of respondent Industrial Accident Commission denying his application for compensation payments from respondent Subsequent Injuries Fund (hereinafter sometimes termed the fund). We have concluded that “labor disablement” rather than “employer knowledge” is the essential factor by which to gauge the previously sustained disablement in determining whether that disability qualifies petitioner for resort to the fund, and that the matter should be remanded to the commission for redetermination in the light of the views hereinafter set forth.

On…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Colonial Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommisionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Tanenbaum v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Subsequent Injuries Fund v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Smith v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  5. State v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Meilves v. MorrisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  2. Franklin v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  3. Jacques v. H. O. Penn MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
  4. Subsequent Injuries Fund v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Subsequent Injuries Fund v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API