Legal Opinion

State v. Industrial Accident Commission

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 22, 1955No. Civ. 16585PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.

Petitioner seeks review and. the annulment of an award and decision after reconsideration made by the respondent Industrial Accident Commission. The award gave respondent Joseph Strauss permanent disability benefits from the Subsequent Injuries Fund. The award was based on a finding that at the time of the industrial injury respondent Strauss suffered from a previous physical disability or physical impairment resulting from heart disease.

Questions Presented

1. May the commission render an award, under section 4751, Labor Code, against the Subsequent Injuries Fund for unmanifested…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Colonial Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommisionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. G. L. Eastman Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com.California Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Associated Indemnity Corp. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  4. Tanenbaum v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Subsequent Injuries Fund v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Franklin v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  2. Ferguson v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Subsequent Injuries Fund v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Gross v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  5. Fred Gledhill Chevrolet v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API