Legal Opinion

Meilves v. Morris

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided January 8, 1968No. 52702PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGER, Judge.

This is an appeal by the custodian of the “Second Injury Fund” from an award in a Workmen’s Compensation claim against that fund. The award was upheld by the Circuit Court. We have jurisdiction because a State Officer, as such, is a party. Grant v. Neal, Mo., 381 S.W.2d 838; Stewart v. Johnson, Mo., 398 S.W.2d 850. In essence, the applicable statute, § 287.220, RSMo 1959, V.A.M.S., provides that if an employee has a “permanent partial disability, whether from compensable injury or otherwise, * * * ” and thereafter receives a subsequent compensable injury resulting in additional…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Wood v. Wagner Electric CorporationSupreme Court of Missouri · 1946
  2. Wilhite v. HurdSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  3. Groce v. PyleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1958
  4. Stewart v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
  5. Cole v. MorrisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Leutzinger v. Treasurer of Missouri Custodian of the Second Injury FundMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Kunce v. Junge Baking CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. Johnson v. City of Duenweg Fire DepartmentSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
  4. Kowalski v. MG Metals and Sales, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Fielder v. Production Credit AssociationMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API