Legal Opinion

Colonial Insurance v. Industrial Accident Commision

California Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 1946No. L. A. 19627PublishedCited by 92 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.

Respondent, Industrial Accident Commission, found that the applicant, Victor E. Pedroza, while employed as “crusher” operator on October 29, 1943, by Emsco Refractories Company, a corporation, hereinafter referred to as employer, engaged in manufacturing bricks, sustained an injury arising out of his employment consisting of silicosis due to exposure to silica dust. Pedroza was employed by said employer during various dates from 1928 to the date of the injury; he did not work for any other employer. At the time of the injury, petitioner, Colonial Insurance Company, was the employer’s…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. G. L. Eastman Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com.California Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Associated Indemnity Corp. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  3. Marsh v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Tanenbaum v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Evans's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by92 opinions

  1. Summers v. TiceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Finnegan v. Royal Realty Co.California Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Granado v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Zemke v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  5. State of California v. Industrial Acc. Com.California Supreme Court · 1957

87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API