Legal Opinion
Jacques v. H. O. Penn MacHinery Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 14, 1974PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBogdanski, J.
This appeal requires this court to construe portions of General Statutes § 31-349, which governs payments to disabled employees from the Second Injury and Compensation Assurance Fund. The respondents, the H. 0. Penn Machinery Company (the Penn Company) and the Aetna Casualty and Surety Company (Aetna), appealed to the Superior Court from an award of the workmen’s compensation commissioner at large. From the judgment dismissing the appeal, the respondents have appealed to this court and the defendant Second Injury and Compensation Assurance Fund has cross appealed.
On April 15, 1970, Paul C.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Lawson v. Suwannee Fruit & Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- American Mutual Insurance Company of Boston and Rose Brothers Company v. Willie B. JonesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
- United Aircraft Corp. v. International Ass'n of MachinistsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- Lanyon v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Fair v. Hartford Rubber Works Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Adzima v. UAC/Norden DivisionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Davis v. City of NorwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Vaillancourt v. New Britain Machine/LittonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Doe v. Institute of Living, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Weinberg v. ARA Vending Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.