Legal Opinion

Subsequent Injuries Fund v. Industrial Accident Commission

California Supreme Court

Decided November 16, 1961No. L. A. 26518PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.

Petitioner Subsequent Injuries Fund (hereinafter sometimes termed the fund) seeks annulment of a decision and award of respondent Industrial Accident Commission in favor of respondent employe Charles 0. Allen and against petitioner. We have concluded that the commission was correct in its determination that the employe’s unknown but permanent hearing loss which existed previous to his sub sequent industrial injury is a rateable factor of permanent disability for purposes of subsequent injuries compensation, and that the award should be affirmed.

In August 1956, while employed as a structural…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Smith v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Ferguson v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Subsequent Injuries Fund v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  4. State v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  5. State v. Industrial Accident CommisionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Franklin v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  2. Jacques v. H. O. Penn MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
  3. Gugelman v. Pressure Treated Timber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Gross v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  5. Subsequent Injuries Fund v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API