Legal Opinion
Subsequent Injuries Fund v. Industrial Accident Commission
California Supreme Court
Decided May 29, 1952No. L. A. 22202PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The Issues Involved
SCHAUER, J.
The Subsequent Injuries Fund of the State of California seeks review of an award of the Industrial Accident Commission. The attorney general, for the fund, contends that certain of the provisions of the Labor Code (§§ 4750-4755) for subsequent injury payments violate those provisions of the California Constitution which state that the Legislature has “plenary power” to create a system of workmen’s compensation (art. XX, § 21) and forbid gifts of public money (art. IV, §31). And even if the legislation in question is constitutional, urges the attorney general, the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Lawson v. Suwannee Fruit & Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Western Indemnity Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Western Metal Supply Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Pacific Coast Casualty Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- County of Los Angeles v. La FuenteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Hustedt v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- County of Los Angeles v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- State of California v. Industrial Acc. Com.California Supreme Court · 1957
- State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Smith v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.