Legal Opinion

Subsequent Injuries Fund v. Industrial Accident Commission

California Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1960No. L. A. 25584PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.

Petitioner Subsequent Injuries Fund of the State of California (hereinafter called the fund) seeks annulment of an award of compensation payments made against it by respondent Industrial Accident Commission, in favor of respondent Baldes. We have concluded that there is no merit in contentions of the fund that the doctrine of the law of the case compels annulment or that the award is without support in the evidence. The award will therefore be affirmed.

In November, 1953, Baldes, then 48 years of age, while in the employ of respondent Bethlehem Pacific Coast Steel Corporation (hereinafter…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. England v. Hospital of the Good SamaritanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Gore v. BingamanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Winthrop v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Smith v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Ferguson v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. People v. TerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  2. DiGenova v. State Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  3. American Mutual Insurance Company of Boston and Rose Brothers Company v. Willie B. JonesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
  4. Clemente v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Franklin v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API