In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Benett
Oregon Supreme Court
1Per curiam
In this lawyer disciplinary proceeding, a trial panel of the Disciplinary Board found that the accused violated Code of Professional Responsibility Disciplinary Rule (DR) 1-102(A)(3) (prohibiting conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation) while representing his client Moore and violated DR 2-106(A) (prohibiting excessive fees) and DR 9-101(0(4) (requiring prompt return of client property) in dealing with his clients Chesney. The trial panel found that the accused had not violated DR 1-102(A)(3) in the Chesney matter. The trial panel suspended the accused for 120 days,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HockettOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- In Re Complaint as to Conduct of DeversOregon Supreme Court · 1999
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of GustafsonOregon Supreme Court · 1998
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of StaufferOregon Supreme Court · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of DuggerOregon Supreme Court · 2002
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of GallagherOregon Supreme Court · 2001
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of KnappenbergerOregon Supreme Court · 2008
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of PaulsonOregon Supreme Court · 2003
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of SummerOregon Supreme Court · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.