Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Summer

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 2005No. OSB 01-199; SC S50870PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

This lawyer disciplinary proceeding involves an Idaho lawyer (the accused) also licensed to practice law in Oregon, whom the Oregon State Bar (Bar) contends attempted to recover twice for a client’s injuries. The Bar’s complaint alleged that the accused violated several rules of the Oregon Code of Professional Responsibility 1 and Oregon statutes or, if the choice of law provision of Oregon State Bar Rule of Procedure (BR) 1.4(b) required application of Idaho’s rules, several Idaho Rules of Professional Conduct. The trial panel concluded that the accused violated Oregon Disciplinary Rule (DR)…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of EadieOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  2. In Re JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of GustafsonOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of KimmellOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  5. In Re Complaint of PiersonOregon Supreme Court · 1977

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Discipline of Brian SteffensenUtah Supreme Court · 2016
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HermanOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  3. In Re the Reciprocal Discipline of WaltonOregon Supreme Court · 2012
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of StricklandOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of LeisureOregon Supreme Court · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API