Legal Opinion
In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Knappenberger
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided June 5, 2008No. OSB 05-54, 05-109, 05-110; SC S054821PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Per curiam
In this lawyer disciplinary proceeding, the Oregon State Bar (Bar) charged Allan F. Knappenberger (the accused) with four violations of the Disciplinary Rules (DR) of the Oregon Code of Professional Responsibility 1 in three causes of complaint. In the Miller matter and the Albright matter, the Bar alleges that the accused violated DR 2-106(A) (lawyer may not charge illegal or clearly excessive fee). In the Dobler matter, the Bar alleges that the accused violated DR 1-102(A)(4) (lawyer may not engage in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice) and DR 7-106(A) (lawyer may not…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of EadieOregon Supreme Court · 2001
- In Re JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1997
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of SchaffnerOregon Supreme Court · 1996
- In Re Complaint as to Conduct of MurdockOregon Supreme Court · 1998
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HuffmanOregon Supreme Court · 2000
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of PaulsonOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of PaulsonOregon Supreme Court · 2010
- Yarboro Sallee v. Tennessee Board of Professional ResponsibilityTennessee Supreme Court · 2015
- In Re the Reciprocal Discipline of LopezOregon Supreme Court · 2011
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of CampbellOregon Supreme Court · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.