Legal Opinion

Strauss v. Strauss

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 22, 1949No. Civ. 16822PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, J.

From a summary judgment in the sum of $4,680, together with interest and costs entered against him pursuant to section 437c of the Code of Civil Procedure, defendant appeals.

This action is on a judgment obtained by plaintiff’s assignor in the Superior Court of Cook County, Illinois. Plaintiff alleges in his complaint that defendant appeared and joined issue in the Illinois action. A copy of the judgment is attached to the complaint and made a part thereof; the judgment recites that defendant was personally served in Los Angeles and that he was represented in the proceedings by counsel, to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Eagle Oil & Refining Co. v. PrenticeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Mutual Life Insurance of New York v. FranckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  3. In Re Estate of PuseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  4. In Re Estate of HancockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Mumma v. MummaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Weichman v. VetriCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  2. People Ex Rel. Mosk v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  3. In Re Marriage of LeffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  4. Perego v. SeltzerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  5. Gillespie v. HaganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API