Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Pusey

California Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 1918No. L. A. No. 5283PublishedCited by 32 opinions

APPEALS from an order of the Superior Court of Orange County admitting a will to probate, and from an order of the same court denying a petition for letters of administration. Z. B. West, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

Gertrude C. Pusey died on October 1, 1914, leaving property subject to administration in Orange County, California. S. H. Finley filed a petition in the superior court of Orange County for the probate of a document dated September 20, 1913, alleged to be the last will of said decedent. Henry F. Pusey, claiming to be the surviving husband .of said decedent, filed a contest of said will on the ground that he was lawfully married to said decedent on June 15, 1914, and that by reason of said marriage said will was by law revoked. (Civ. Code, sec. 1300.) M. M. Crookshank, as nominee of H. F.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hahn v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  2. Anderson v. GoffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Stearus v. AguirreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
  4. Falkner v. HendyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. White v. McLaughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Central Savings Bank of Oakland v. LakeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Hall v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. In Re Estate of PuseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Delanoy v. DelanoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  5. De Hart v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API