Legal Opinion
People Ex Rel. Mosk v. City of Santa Barbara
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 22, 1961No. Civ. 24823PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFourt, J.
This is an appeal by the city of Santa Barbara from a summary judgment (Code Civ. Proc., § 437c) entered on October 1, 1959, adjudging that “The annexation proceedings and the ordinances of annexation passed pursuant thereto . . . are null and void. ...”
A résumé of the facts is as follows:
The annexation proceedings were initiated by the legislative body of the city of Santa Barbara (i.e., Council) on its own motion by Resolution Number 3162 adopted April 11, 1957. Both public and private owners of property were involved in the area to be annexed.
The State of California (hereinafter called…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Eagle Oil & Refining Co. v. PrenticeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- In Re HainesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Delaney v. LoweryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- American Distilling Co. v. City Council of SausalitoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- People Ex Rel. Averna v. City of Palm SpringsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Gonzales v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Dean W. Knight & Sons, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. Department of TransportationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Prudential Insurance of America v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Estate of WemyssCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Vallejo v. Montebello Sewer Co. Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1962
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.