Legal Opinion
Weichman v. Vetri
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 27, 1950No. Civ. 17832PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilson, J.
This appeal presents the simple question whether a summary judgment shall be allowed to stand when defendant’s answer denies all material allegations of the complaint and the denials in his response to the motion for summary judgment and to plaintiff’s affidavits present a triable issue of fact and a defense to the cause of action. The answer to this question is that in such circumstances the summary judgment must be reversed. (Strauss v. Strauss, 90 Cal.App.2d 757, 759 [203 P.2d 857]; Gillespie v. Hagan, 94 Cal.App.2d 566, 571 [211 P.2d 9].)
The complaint contains three counts: That (1)…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Eagle Oil & Refining Co. v. PrenticeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Gardenswartz v. Equitable Etc. Soc.California Court of Appeal · 1937
- Gardner v. ShreveCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Strauss v. StraussCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Haumeder v. LipsettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Southern Pacific Co. v. FishCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Family Service Agency of Santa Barbara v. AmesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Albermont Petroleum, Ltd. v. CunninghamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Meyer Koulish Co. v. CannonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Associated Creditors' Agency v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.