Legal Opinion
Gillespie v. Hagan
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 9, 1949No. Civ. 17191PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilson, J.
Appeal by defendants from a summary judgment rendered pursuant to section 437c * of the Code of Civil Procedure and from an order denying their motion to vacate the same. The sole question to be determined is whether the pleadings and affidavits ‘ ‘ present a triable issue of fact. ’ ’
Plaintiff, a licensed real estate and business opportunity-broker, brought this action to recover a commission alle'ged to be due and owing to her for services rendered in the sale of real and personal property. The complaint alleges that defendants were the owners of certain real property and were the owners…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Eagle Oil & Refining Co. v. PrenticeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. CasadyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Gardner v. ShreveCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Rice Lands & Products Co. v. BlevinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Strauss v. StraussCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Newport v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Weichman v. VetriCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- People Ex Rel. Mosk v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Pickens v. American Mortgage ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Hagin v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.