Legal Opinion
Mutual Life Insurance of New York v. Franck
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 17, 1935No. Civ. 5353PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
The defendant and cross-complainant. Beulah Franck has appealed from the judgment rendered against her in a suit to determine the right and title to the proceeds of an endowment policy.
Albert J. Franck and the respondent Coral La Fontaine Franck were married July 13, 1917. They established their home in Nevada. Two fifteen-year endowment life insurance policies numbered 2658767 and 2658771, respectively, for the sum of $5,000 each were issued to him October 22, 1919. The annual premium on each policy was the sum of $348.80. His wife Coral was named as beneficiary in each of these policies.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Haddock v. HaddockSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Blethen v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Delanoy v. DelanoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Shoudy v. ShoudyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- McEwen v. New York Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Torchia on Behalf of Torchia v. TorchiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Grimm v. GrimmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- In Re La CroixCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Murphy v. Travelers InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Sandra Joanne Murphy, Plaintiff-Third Party Defendant-Appellant-Cross v. The Travelers Insurance Company, Defendant-Third Party Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. Barbara A. Murphy, Individually and as Parent and Natural Guardian of Minors Lee S. Murphy, Etc., Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.