Mumma v. Mumma
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtWilson, J.
This is an action to recover damages for fraud and to set aside the interlocutory decree of divorce obtained by plaintiff against defendant. A demurrer to the complaint was sustained without leave to amend. Judgment for defendant was entered from which plaintiff appeals.
The pleaded facts in plaintiff’s first cause of action are: That in reliance on the fraudulent representations of defendant to plaintiff that there was no existing legal impediment to his entering into a valid marriage with her, plaintiff, on August 22, 1934, in the city of Los Angeles, entered into a ceremonial form of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. ThrockmortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Pico v. CohnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Kinnier v. . KinnierNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Estate of DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Cardinale v. CardinaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. SilvaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- Strauss v. StraussCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Treece v. TreeceIdaho Supreme Court · 1962
- Brown v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
- Rudnick v. RudnickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.