In Re Estate of Hancock
California Supreme Court
'APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order denying a new trial in a proceeding to determine heirship in the matter of the estate of a deceased person. James C. Rives, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment and an order denying a new trial in a proceeding instituted under the provisions of section 1664 of the Code of Civil Procedure, in the matter of the estate of Milton Taylor Hancock, deceased, to determine the “heirship to said deceased.” By the decree it was determined that the heirs at law of deceased are his surviving wife and three minor children of said deceased and said surviving wife, all born prior to the year 1902, and Mollie Hancock McNatt, and John Philip Hancock, children of said deceased and Nancy Hancock, a former wife of deceased. This appeal…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Thompson v. WhitmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Hahn v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- Forbes v. HydeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- People v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Ricketson v. RichardsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Delanoy v. DelanoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Mutual Life Insurance of New York v. FranckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Crouch v. CrouchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- In Re Estate of PuseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Ainscow v. AlexanderOrphan's Court of Delaware · 1944
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.