Legal Opinion
Olson v. Heise
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 29, 1936No. Nos. 30,890, 30,891PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Julius J. Olson, Justice.
For the third time the parties in this cause are appearing here. The first appeal came before us in Olson v. Heise, 194 Minn. 280, 260 N. W. 227, 261 N. W. 476. The second review appears in State ex rel. Olson v. District Court, 196 Minn. 56, 263 N. W. 908.
Upon the first appeal there was a reversal of the judgments entered below. After the mandates went down to the trial court the Heises moved for new trial in each case. That matter came before the court on appropriate motion August 14, 1935. On that date the court announced to counsel that the motion of the Heises…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Spicer v. StebbinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- Kruchowski v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
- Satanta State Bank v. O. B. McClintock Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
- Olson v. HeiseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
- State Ex Rel. Olson v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
3Cited by5 opinions
- Von Bank v. MayerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Thompson v. MannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
- Voller v. SchmitzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- Kelly v. BowmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- Schaumburg v. LudwigSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953