Legal Opinion

Kelly v. Bowman

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 10, 1937No. 31,291PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Appeal from an order granting a new trial, upon defendants’ motion after verdict in favor of plaintiff. Memoranda attached to and made part of the order recite that it was granted exclusively for errors of law occurring at the trial, upon the grounds (1) that there was no evidence to justify a finding that the defendants or any of them converted the stock claimed to have been converted; (2) that if the stock was converted the evidence did not show that the defendants were liable therefor because the conversion was by others; (3) that the proof of damages was speculative and did not establish…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Roelofs v. BaberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
  2. Olson v. HeiseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Von Bank v. MayerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  2. Thompson v. MannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  3. Voller v. SchmitzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  4. Schaumburg v. LudwigSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API