Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Olson v. District Court
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided December 20, 1935No. 30,724PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Stone, Justice.
Two cases, consolidated for trial, which have been here before, 194 Minn. 280, 260 N. W. 227, 261 N. W. 476, return, this time on an alternative writ of mandamus (State ex rel. Broderick v. District Court, 91 Minn. 161, 97 N. W. 581) to the Honorable W. A. Schultz, one of the judges of the district court for the first judicial district, and others, which was procured in an effort on the part of the Olsons as relators to compel performance of what they consider was required by our mandate on the former appeal. Their complaint is that, notwithstanding that mandate, Judge Schultz…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Noonan v. SpearSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Smith v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- State ex rel. Broderick v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
- Ricker v. J. L. Owens Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
- Olson v. HeiseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Marriage of Berthiaume v. BerthiaumeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Sorlie v. ThomasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- Casper v. Regional Agricultural Credit Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
- Marriage of Lappi v. LappiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Olson v. HeiseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936