Legal Opinion

Satanta State Bank v. O. B. McClintock Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 14, 1936No. 30,691PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Loring, Justice.

This is an action to recover the purchase price of a burglar alarm system purchased by plaintiff of defendant. Plaintiff has appealed from an order denying its motion for new trial.

April 4, 1931, plaintiff entered into a contract with defendant for the purchase of a burglar alarm system to be installed by defendant in plaintiff’s bank building at Satanta, Kansas. Among other provisions of the contract the defendant covenanted:

“The O. B. McClintock Company agrees to, and does hereby guarantee the full and complete operation of the System described iu this order, subject to the…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Satter v. TurnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  2. Vasatka v. MatschSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  3. Brown v. BertrandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  4. Kruchowski v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
  5. Olson v. HeiseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API