Legal Opinion
Von Bank v. Mayer
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 19, 1953No. 36,104PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Dell, Justice.
The matter before us is a motion to dismiss the appeal of the defendants, Earl Lomis and Stanley L. Rybus, from the amended order of the district court of Scott county granting plaintiff’s motion for a new trial. This is a personal injury action in which there was a verdict in favor of the defendants, Lomis and Rybus, the action having been dismissed as to the defendant, K. R. Mayer, during the course of the trial.
Plaintiff moved for a new trial claiming (1) irregularity in the proceedings of the court whereby the plaintiff was deprived of a fair trial; (2) accident or surprise…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Weatherhead v. BurauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- Spicer v. StebbinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- Backstrom v. New York Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
- Thompson v. MannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
- Voller v. SchmitzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Satter v. TurnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Koenigs v. WernerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
- Smith v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- McMillen v. MeyerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- Laramie Motors, Inc. v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.