Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Mann

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 4, 1938No. Nos. 31,575, 31,578PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

After verdict in favor of plaintiff, defendants’ motions for new trial were granted. Two orders were made, attached to which were memoranda made part of the orders. In the memorandum made part of the first order the court below stated that a new trial was granted because of failure of plaintiff to prove that he was administrator, as alleged in the complaint. Another alleged error was discussed but not passed on because it was not before the court. Upon application of plaintiff, the court reconsidered the matter. A sec ond order was made, confirming the first order granting a new trial, •but…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Spicer v. StebbinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  2. Backstrom v. New York Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  3. Olson v. HeiseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  4. Kelly v. BowmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Von Bank v. MayerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  2. Anderson v. GabrielsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  3. Briggs v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  4. Voller v. SchmitzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  5. Schaumburg v. LudwigSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API