Legal Opinion

Voller v. Schmitz

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 7, 1952No. 35,636PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frank T. Gallagher, Justice.

Appeal from an order of the district court denying defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and granting a new trial unless plaintiff should consent to a reduction of the verdict from $15,000 to $5,000. The appeal was taken by plaintiff from the whole of said order. We are considering only the appeal from the order granting a new trial. Obviously, plaintiff would not be appealing from that part of the order denying defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict.

The action was brought by plaintiff against defendant, a physician and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Spicer v. StebbinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  2. Backstrom v. New York Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  3. Thompson v. MannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  4. Olson v. HeiseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  5. Kelly v. BowmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Koenigs v. WernerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  2. Von Bank v. MayerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  3. Anderson v. JennieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  4. Dubois v. ClarkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  5. Schaumburg v. LudwigSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API