Legal Opinion

Olson v. Heise

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 12, 1935No. Nos. 30,236, 30,237PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1 Reported in 260 N.W. 227, 261 N.W. 476. The two cases were tried together. The verdicts and the answers to special interrogatories established that Carl Olson was damaged by false representations with respect to the personal property purchased of the Heises in the sum of $300 and in respect to the farm in the sum of $1,700. It appears that in the spring of 1929 Carl Olson was the owner of a home in St. Paul, and Bertha R. Heise was the owner of a 160-acre farm in the town of Hay Creek, Goodhue county, equipped with the needful stock and farm machinery. The equity in the Olson home was…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gates v. HerbergerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  2. State v. SpragueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  3. Olson v. HeiseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  4. State Ex Rel. Olson v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
  5. State Ex Rel. Olson v. SchultzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API