Legal Opinion
White Bear Rod and Gun Club v. City of Hugo
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 20, 1986No. C3-85-805PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SIMONETT, Justice.
We reverse the court of appeals’ ruling that a city council lacks jurisdiction to entertain an application to award a special use permit for the operation of a gun club because of the existence of a district court injunction prohibiting the gun club’s operation. We remand to the city council to prepare adequate findings of fact for its decision denying the requested amendment.
In May 1974, respondent City of Hugo issued to petitioner-relator White Bear Rod and Gun Club a special use permit to operate a gun club about 1 ½ miles east of the built-up portion of the city. The…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Honn v. City of Coon RapidsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- C. R. Investments, Inc. v. Village of ShoreviewSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Minnesota Public Interest Research Group v. White Bear Rod & Gun ClubSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- White Bear Docking & Storage, Inc. v. City of White Bear LakeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Corwine v. Crow Wing CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Interstate Power Co. v. Nobles County Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Tischer v. Housing & Redevelopment Authority of CambridgeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- Chad Nelson, Below v. Troy Schlener, Carla Brown, Below, Minnesota Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- Mendota Golf, LLP v. City of Mendota HeightsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- Earthburners, Inc. v. County of CarltonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.