Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Earthburners, Inc. v. County of Carlton

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 18, 1994No. C5-93-110PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COYNE, Justice.

We granted the petition of Carlton County to consider whether the proceedings of its county board were in compliance with Carlton County, Mn. Ordinance 6, § 20 (Aug. 1, 1978), with respect to Earthburners, Inc.’s application for a conditional use permit. Because we conclude that the proceedings were deficient, we reverse and remand for the board’s reconsideration of the application.

Earthburners is interested in operating a “soil roaster” in Carlton County on leased land currently used as a gravel pit. The facility is designed to heat dirt collected from service station…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Honn v. City of Coon RapidsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  2. Swanson v. City of BloomingtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  3. White Bear Rod and Gun Club v. City of HugoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  4. Metro 500, Inc. v. City of Brooklyn ParkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  5. Earthburners, Inc. v. County of CarltonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Interstate Power Co. v. Nobles County Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  2. Tischer v. Housing & Redevelopment Authority of CambridgeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  3. In Re StadsvoldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  4. Handicraft Block Ltd. Partnership v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  5. In Re LivingoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API