Legal Opinion
Tischer v. Housing & Redevelopment Authority of Cambridge
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 24, 2005No. A03-845PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HANSON, Justice.
Appellant Sandy Tischer sued respondent Cambridge Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) for breach of an employment contract when it eliminated her executive director position and terminated her employment. The district court assumed jurisdiction over her claim, ruling that Minn.Stat. § 469.014 (2004), which specifies that HRAs “shall be liable in contract or in tort in the same manner as a private corporation,” provides an exception to the general rule that public employees may only challenge the termination of their employment by writ of certiorari. The court of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Ging v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
- Lafayette Place Associates v. Boston Redevelopment AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
- Dietz v. Dodge CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Dokmo v. Independent School District No. 11Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Vlahos v. R&I Construction of Bloomington, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Marriage of Rubey v. VannettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- Williams v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- McInnish v. RileySupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
- State of Minnesota, Respondent/Cross-Appellant v. Brian Keith Schnagl, a/k/a Brian Keith Schnagel, Appellant/Cross-Respondent.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- County of Washington v. City of Oak Park HeightsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.