Legal Opinion
Interstate Power Co. v. Nobles County Board of Commissioners
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided October 12, 2000No. C4-98-1607PublishedCited by 69 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BLATZ, Chief Justice
Appellant Nobles County Board of Commissioners (“Board”) denied the application of Respondent Interstate Power Company (“Interstate”) for a conditional use permit (“CUP”) to upgrade an electrical transmission line. The denial was based in part on an amendment to the applicable county zoning ordinance that was adopted by the Board after the Board initially approved the CUP with a special condition. An appeal of that action was remanded by the court of appeals for findings sufficient to enable judicial review. The court of appeals affirmed the Board’s denial of…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Bradley v. School Bd. of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Honn v. City of Coon RapidsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Zylka v. City of CrystalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- Ridgewood Development Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Holen v. Minneapolis-St. Paul Metropolitan Airports CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- American Tower, L.P. v. City of GrantSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- State of Minnesota v. Dylan Micheal KelleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- Mendota Golf, LLP v. City of Mendota HeightsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. Roman NoseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- Armstrong v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2006
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.