Legal Opinion

Minnesota Public Interest Research Group v. White Bear Rod & Gun Club

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 22, 1977No. 46951PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MacLAUGHLIN, Justice.

This is an action for declaratory and in-junctive relief pursuant to the Minnesota Environmental Rights Act, Minn.St. c. 116B. The trial court granted declaratory judgment stating that defendant’s activities in constructing and operating a trap-and-skeet-shooting facility on the southerly border of Rice Lake near Hugo in Washington County constitute pollution, materially affect the environment adversely, and constitute impairment or destruction of the environment. The trial court permanently enjoined the operation of defendant’s facility at that location, and defendant…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Reserve Mining Co. v. HerbstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. Ray v. Mason County Drain CommissionerMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Balafas v. AngelosSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  4. COUNTY OF FREEBORN BY TUVESON v. BrysonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  5. County of Freeborn v. BrysonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. White Bear Rod and Gun Club v. City of HugoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  2. People for Environmental Enlightenment & Responsibility (PEER), Inc. v. Minnesota Environmental Quality CouncilSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  3. Carl Bolander & Sons Co. v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  4. Marriage of Rosenberg v. RosenbergCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  5. Citizens for a Safe Grant v. Lone Oak Sportsmen's Club, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API