Legal Opinion
Seebach v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided January 19, 1968No. 123-63PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Per Curiam :*
Plaintiff seeks recovery for the period sbe was involuntarily placed on sick leave, annual leave, and leave without pay, under the following circumstances:1
She was employed by the Bureau of Internal Revenue in San Francisco, California, as a tax examiner to audit income tax returns. Occasionally she interviewed taxpayers to obtain additional information.
By 1960 and for some túne prior thereto the plaintiff, then single and 45 years of age and overweight, was unkempt and careless in her attire and general appearance. She was obsessed with the view that women were being…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. WickershamSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- John Burich v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
- Mary E. Seebach v. Joseph M. Cullen, District Director, Bureau of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Everett v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- Joe B. Everett v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Albert Piccone v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
- Cunningham v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1977
- BrownUnited States Court of Claims · 1978
- Sokoloff v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
- Ciambelli v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.