Legal Opinion
Albert Piccone v. The United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided February 14, 1969No. 352-62PublishedCited by 63 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVIS, Judge*
Plaintiff, a non-veteran, sues to recover back pay from the date he was separated from his civilian position with the Navy at the Philadelphia Naval Shipyard; his removal was on the ground that he was physically unable to perform the duties of his rating and that his separation would therefore promote the efficiency of the service. He presents several grounds for recovery; we find that an important procedural requirement of the Navy’s own regulations was violated in his separation, and do not reach his other contentions.
Piccone had permanent status in the career civil…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Service v. DullesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. WickershamSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Samuel C. Dysart and Alma R. Dysart v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- William Merle Canaday v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1966
- Missouri Pacific Railroad Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- Jane Doe v. Robert E. Hampton, Individually and as Chairman, U. S. Civil Service CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Louise J. Hamlet v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Fiorentino v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
- Gulf States Manufacturers, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Joseph C. Spagnola, Jr. v. David Stockman, Director, Office of Management and BudgetCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.