Legal Opinion
Mary E. Seebach v. Joseph M. Cullen, District Director, Bureau of Internal Revenue
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 6, 1964No. 19145_1PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BASTIAN, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from an order of the United States District Court granting summary judgment in favor of appellees, thereby upholding appellant’s dismissal from her position with the Internal Revenue Service.
Judicial review of dismissal from federal employment, a matter of executive agency discretion, is limited to a determination of whether the required procedural steps have been substantially complied with. Keim v. United States, 177 U.S. 290, 20 S.Ct. 574, 44 L.Ed. 774 (1900); and see Hargett v. Summerfield, 100 U.S.App.D.C. 85, 243 F.2d 29 (1957), and cases there…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Keim v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Newell M. Hargett v. Arthur E. SummerfieldCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
- Charles S. Thomas, Secretary of the Department of the Navy v. William E. WardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955
- Frank H. De Fino v. Robert S. McNamara Secretary of DfenseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1961
3Cited by59 opinions
- Jane Doe v. Robert E. Hampton, Individually and as Chairman, U. S. Civil Service CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Elkhart Engineering Corporation v. Dornier WerkeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
- Robert P. Smith v. James R. Schlesinger, Secretary of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- Laymon Wesley Alsbury v. The United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- Ulysses S. Vigil v. Post Office Department of the United States of America and the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.