Legal Opinion
Cunningham v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided January 26, 1977No. 433-60PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam :
In Cunningham v. United States, 191 Ct. Cl. 471, 423 F. 2d 1379 (1970), tbis court en banc held that the plaintiff in this case had been illegally separated from her civilian position with the Air Force on June 12, 1959. The court ruled that she was entitled to back pay from the date of the wrongful severance to date of judgment, less applicable offsets. This ruling, of course, as in all such cases, implicitly mandated that she prove in a subsequent proceeding under Buie 131(c) that she was ready, willing, and able to perform the duties of her Air Force post at all times during…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Friedman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
- Scroggins v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
- Nicholas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Charles E. Chaudoin v. Clarence E. Atkinson, JrCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
- Theresa Milliken v. J. F. Gleason, Jr., in His Capacity as Administrator of Veterans' AffairsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1964
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Gabriel J. Martinez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- David W. Heisig v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Stephen W. Richey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- John H. Vandermolen v. John C. Stetson, Secretary of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- R. R. v. Department of the ArmyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1980
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.