Legal Opinion

Brown

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 27, 1978No. 490-76PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This pro se civilian pay case is before the court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment, without oral argument. The plaintiffs James E. Brown (Brown) and Ronald H. Davis (Davis) both seek Living Quarters Al*711lowances (LQA) pursuant to regulations promulgated under the Overseas Differential and Allowances Act, 5 U.S.C. § 5921 (1970) et seq.; the parties present common questions of law in regard to certain aspects of these claims. Brown also presents two additional claims: (1) that he is entitled to separation travel from Germany to the United States under a 36-month travel agreement…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Roberts v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
  2. James E. Brown v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  3. Adde v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  4. Brown v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
  5. Roberts v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API