Brown
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
This pro se civilian pay case is before the court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment, without oral argument. The plaintiffs James E. Brown (Brown) and Ronald H. Davis (Davis) both seek Living Quarters Al*711lowances (LQA) pursuant to regulations promulgated under the Overseas Differential and Allowances Act, 5 U.S.C. § 5921 (1970) et seq.; the parties present common questions of law in regard to certain aspects of these claims. Brown also presents two additional claims: (1) that he is entitled to separation travel from Germany to the United States under a 36-month travel agreement…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Roberts v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- James E. Brown v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Adde v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Brown v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
- Roberts v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.