Legal Opinion

Allen v. Chambers

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1897No. 2582PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Thurston County.—Hon. T. M. Reed, Jr., Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Anders, J.

Respondent herein instituted an action in the superior court of Thurston county against appellants A. H. Chambers and Robert Trost, and other parties, to recover the amount due on a promissory note for $8,000 executed by the Olympia Light and Power Company to the said defendants, and by them indorsed to the plaintiff. The defendants set up in their answer as a defense, among other things, that the money for which the note was given was borrowed and used by the Light and Power Company, and that the defendants were mere sureties upon the note.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Wagner v. LawWashington Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Henrietta v. EvansCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Horton v. Donohoe Kelly Banking Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1896
  4. McDonough v. CraigWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Hull v. ViningWashington Supreme Court · 1897

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gibbons v. GoldsmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1915
  2. Floding v. DenholmWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Bird v. SteeleWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Allen v. ChambersWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Konnerup v. MilspaughWashington Supreme Court · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API