Legal Opinion

Bird v. Steele

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1913No. 11247PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Clifford, J., entered March 5, 1913, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action to foreclose a mortgage.

1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.

— On May 17, 1910, Roberge, Steele & Roberge entered into a contract for lathing a building, at Vancouver, B. C. For some reason, not now material, one member of the firm retired, and it was agreed that the two remaining members should complete the contract,, receiving therefor an additional sum of $1,000, or $11,700 for the work; that in all other respects the contract should stand as before; and that security should be given to respondent for performance of the work for the benefit of Raftery & Company. Thereafter defendants Callie L. Steele and Mary E. Steele executed a mortgage upon…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Norcross v. WymanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
  2. Van Lehn v. MorseWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Oregon Improvement Co. v. SagmeisterWashington Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Anderson v. BurgoyneWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Horton v. Donohoe Kelly Banking Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1896

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ruth v. RhodesArizona Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Bergman v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Whiting v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Gibbons v. GoldsmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1915
  5. Henning v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1922

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API