Legal Opinion

Wagner v. Law

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 13, 1892No. 282PublishedCited by 44 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Pierce County. Action by Christina Wagner against James W. Law and others to set aside certain fraudulent conveyances which constitute a cloud on plaintiff’s title to certain lands. Judgment on demurrer dismissing the complaint, from which judgment plaintiff appeals. 1

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dunbab, J.

This is an action brought by the judgment creditor, who was also an execution purchaser, to set aside a fraudulent conveyance made by the judgment debtor, which is alleged to be a cloud upon the plaintiff’s title. The complaint alleges the fraudulent conveyance of the land for the purpose of defrauding his creditors, and especially the plaintiff; alleges the execution and sale and conveyance of the land in question to plaintiff. A demurrer was interposed to the complaint and sustained by the court below. Judgment was entered in favor of the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. McNew's Executors v. RogersTennessee Supreme Court · 1848
  2. Clason v. BaileyCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1817
  3. Hildreth v. SandsNew York Court of Chancery · 1816
  4. Harrison v. KramerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1856
  5. Bergh v. WarnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Ziska v. ZiskaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. Cornell v. EdsenWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Cooper v. RheaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  4. Garrett v. ByerlyWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  5. McAvoy v. JenningsWashington Supreme Court · 1906

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API