Floding v. Denholm
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Huston, J., entered February 24, 1905, after a hearing on the merits before the court without a jury, enjoining the sheriff of Pierce county from selling community property under a judgment against the husband on appeal and supersedeas bonds.
1Opinion of the CourtMount, C. J.
In the year 1903 three several judgments were obtained in the superior court of Pierce county, against the Washington Match Company, a corporation. The corporation appealed from each of these judgments to this court. A supersedeas bond on appeal was given in each of the cases. Eric Floding, one of the respondents herein, was a surety on each of said supersedeas bonds. All of said judgments were afterwards affirmed by this court, and judgments were rendered against the Washington Match Company and the surer *464ties on. the appeal and supersedeas bonds. Thereafter executions were issued, and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Brotton v. LangertWashington Supreme Court · 1890
- Van Lehn v. MorseWashington Supreme Court · 1896
- Oregon Improvement Co. v. SagmeisterWashington Supreme Court · 1892
- Horton v. Donohoe Kelly Banking Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1896
- Shuey v. AdairWashington Supreme Court · 1901
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Swanson v. HoodWashington Supreme Court · 1918
- McFadden v. WatsonArizona Supreme Court · 1938
- Day v. HenryWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Milne v. KaneWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- McGregor v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1910
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.