Legal Opinion

McDonough v. Craig

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1894No. 1211PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King County,

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hoyt, J.

This action was brought to recover upon two promissory notes executed by defendant Charles Craig. The appellant, Annie Craig, was joined as a defendant, and the allegations in the complaint relied upon as justifying such joinder were that she was and had been during the entire time covered by the transactions, the wife of said Charles Craig; that the promissory notes in question had been given by the husband in the prosecution of community business, and that the consideration therefor was used for its benefit., And it was sought by these…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Littell & Smythe Manufacturing Co. v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Oregon Improvement Co. v. SagmeisterWashington Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Commercial Bank v. ScottWashington Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Anderson v. BurgoyneWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Clark v. EltingeWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Woste v. RuggeWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Swenson v. StoltzWashington Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Gund v. ParkeWashington Supreme Court · 1896

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API