Legal Opinion

Hull v. Vining

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 13, 1897No. 2585PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Pierce County.— Hon. John C. Stallcup, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Gordon, J.

The respondent brought suit in the superior court of Pierce county to foreclose a mortgage upon certain real property therein situated, given to secure a note executed by Ralph T. Vining and wife for the sum of $3,500 and interest. In the foreclosure suit the appellant, Truman W. Enos, was made a party defendant under the allegation that he had purchased the mortgaged property subsequent to the execution of the mortgage “ for a good and valuable consideration, a part of which was the assumption of said mortgage, which mortgage debt said…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bailey v. TaaffeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Huart v. GoyenecheCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. White v. HolmWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Morin v. BurrisWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Little v. KingWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Little v. KingWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Morin v. BurrisWashington Supreme Court · 2007

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API