Legal Opinion
Konnerup v. Milspaugh
Washington Supreme Court
Decided October 7, 1912No. 10423PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Snohomish county, Black, J., entered February 28, 1912, in favor of the plaintiffs, upon an agreed statement of facts, in an action of ejectment.
1Opinion of the CourtCrow, J.
This action was commenced by Rasmus Konnerup and Anna Konnerup, his wife, against Frank C. Milspaugh, Millie Milspaugh, his wife, Bert Ernst and Cora Ernst, his wife, to recover possession of real estate.' From a judgment in plaintiffs’ favor, the defendants Milspaugh and wife have appealed.
The action was tried upon an agreed statement of facts as shown by a written stipulation filed herein, material portions of which read as follows:
“2nd. That on the 28th day of June, 1909, plaintiffs recovered judgment against Thomas Egers and Laura Egers, his wife, and Bert Ernst and Cora Ernst, his wife,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wagner v. LawWashington Supreme Court · 1892
- McAvoy v. JenningsWashington Supreme Court · 1906
- Ontario Land Co. v. YordyWashington Supreme Court · 1906
- Hamilton Brown Shoe Co. v. AdamsWashington Supreme Court · 1892
- Samuel v. KittengerWashington Supreme Court · 1893
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Federal Intermediate Credit Bank of Spokane v. O/S SABLEFISHWashington Supreme Court · 1989
- Maxwell v. MaxwellWashington Supreme Court · 1942
- Moller v. GrahamWashington Supreme Court · 1918
- Heath v. DodsonWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- Thompson v. StackWashington Supreme Court · 1944