Horton v. Donohoe Kelly Banking Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from Superior Court, King County.— Hon. J. W. ‘Langley, Judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Anders, J.
Respondents move to dismiss the appeal for the reason that the affidavit of the surety in the appeal bond does not state that such surety is worth 'the required amount over and above all debts and liabilities, as required by the statute.
It was held in the case of McEachern v. Brackett, 8 *400Wash. 652 (36 Pac. 690), that defects of this kind were not such as would justify the dismissal of the appeal, and such ruling was affirmed in the cases of Warburton v. Ralph, 9 Wash. 537 (38 Pac. 140), and Cook v. Tibbals, 12 Wash. 207 (40 Pac. 935); and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Oregon Improvement Co. v. SagmeisterWashington Supreme Court · 1892
- Stockand v. BartlettWashington Supreme Court · 1892
- McEachern v. BrackettWashington Supreme Court · 1894
- Warburton v. RalphWashington Supreme Court · 1894
- Cook v. TibbalsWashington Supreme Court · 1895
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Way v. Lyric Theater Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
- Weiser v. HolzmanWashington Supreme Court · 1903
- Gibbons v. GoldsmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1915
- Shuey v. AdairWashington Supreme Court · 1901
- Floding v. DenholmWashington Supreme Court · 1905
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.